Health Insurance Coverage for Addiction Treatment in California

Key Takeaways

• Federal MHPAEA (2008) and California SB 855 (2021) require health plans to cover substance-use disorder benefits on parity terms with comparable medical-surgical benefits. A plan that imposes more restrictive prior-auth, higher cost-sharing, or narrower limits on SUD care than on medical care is likely in parity violation.
• Plan type determines network rules. HMO plans require in-network use except for emergencies. PPO plans cover out-of-network at reduced rates. EPO plans cover in-network only (no OON coverage). Kaiser is a closed-network integrated system.
• Prior authorization is standard for residential treatment and for many IOP/PHP admissions. Denials are appealable — internally, then externally through the California Department of Managed Health Care Independent Medical Review for state-regulated plans.
• The No Surprises Act (2022) protects patients from balance-billing for emergency SUD care and certain out-of-network situations at in-network facilities.
• Coverage scope under parity: detox, residential treatment (all ASAM levels), IOP, PHP, outpatient counseling, medication-assisted treatment (buprenorphine, methadone, naltrexone, disulfiram, acamprosate), care coordination, peer support where plan-covered.
• We are not a benefits-verification service that routes to facilities. Our Verify Insurance tool checks coverage without triggering facility sales contact. No referral fees, no paid listings.

How California health insurance covers addiction treatment

California health insurance covers substance-use disorder treatment under two parallel parity frameworks: the federal Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) of 2008 and California’s strengthened state parity under SB 855 (Wiener, 2020), effective January 1, 2021. Both laws require that SUD benefits be structurally no more restrictive than comparable medical-surgical benefits. This page explains what that means practically — how commercial insurance in California covers residential, outpatient, detox, and MAT; how to navigate prior authorization; how to appeal denials; and where our editorial independence posture diverges from aggregator directories that monetize through facility referrals.

Our cost-of-rehab pillar breaks down pricing by ASAM level. This page covers how insurance works against those prices. Our Medi-Cal coverage pillar covers public-payer coverage. Commercial insurance specifics by carrier — Kaiser, Anthem Blue Cross, Blue Shield, Tricare — are covered in dedicated pillars linked above. We accept no referral fees from any facility discussed on this site.

What federal and California parity law actually require

Federal MHPAEA (2008)

Requires group health plans and individual insurance coverage offering mental health and SUD benefits to cover those benefits on terms no more restrictive than medical-surgical benefits. The comparison happens across six categories:

• Financial requirements (copays, deductibles, coinsurance)
• Quantitative treatment limitations (visit caps, day limits)
• Non-quantitative treatment limitations (prior auth, concurrent review, medical-necessity criteria, network composition)

Enforcement authority sits with the Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) for ERISA-governed plans, HHS/CMS for non-federal governmental plans, and state insurance departments for state-regulated plans.

California SB 855 (2021)

Extends and strengthens parity for California state-regulated plans. Specifically:

• Requires medical necessity to be determined using generally accepted standards of care — in practice, ASAM Criteria for SUD and LOCUS/CALOCUS for mental health
• Prohibits narrow medical-necessity criteria that have been used by some carriers to deny residential SUD treatment
• Extends coverage to all conditions in the DSM-5 — removing prior carve-outs
• Requires transparent claims review processes and imposes specific appeal-procedure requirements

SB 855 matters because pre-2021 California parity enforcement was limited by narrow medical-necessity criteria that carriers used to restrict SUD residential access. The post-SB-855 regulatory posture gives patients and providers more standing to challenge denials rooted in proprietary medical-necessity frameworks.

California Health and Safety Code § 1374.72

Governs HMO parity for state-regulated plans under the California Department of Managed Health Care. Complements SB 855 and applies at the HMO product level.

Plan types and what they mean for SUD coverage

HMO (Health Maintenance Organization)

Members must use in-network providers except for true emergencies. Referrals from primary care physicians are typically required for specialty care, including residential SUD. Out-of-network residential is generally not covered at all.

For SUD: HMO members need to confirm the facility is in the plan’s SUD network before admission. In-network facilities for commercial HMOs in SoCal are a subset of the broader 1,501-facility market. Plans publish provider directories online, though accuracy is variable; verify with the facility directly.

Kaiser Permanente operates as an HMO structurally (single closed network) but with a unique integrated delivery model — Kaiser members receive SUD care almost entirely within Kaiser’s Chemical Dependency Recovery Program (CDRP) rather than through external network contracts.

PPO (Preferred Provider Organization)

Members can use out-of-network providers at higher cost-sharing. Both in-network and out-of-network residential are covered, with the patient responsible for higher coinsurance and potentially balance-billing beyond the plan’s usual-and-customary rate for OON care.

For SUD: PPO plans are operationally the easiest to navigate for residential. Most CARF-accredited SoCal residential facilities that work with insurance accept PPO plans, either in-network with the major carriers or on an OON basis. OON residential can still be affordable if the plan’s OON benefit is robust.

EPO (Exclusive Provider Organization)

In-network only (like HMO) but without the primary-care-referral requirement. Usable for direct specialty access. No OON coverage except emergency.

For SUD: EPO behaves like HMO for network purposes. Confirm the facility is in-network.

HDHP + HSA (High-Deductible Health Plan with Health Savings Account)

Any of the above plan types can be structured as HDHP. The patient pays full billed rates until the deductible is met; plan benefits kick in after.

For SUD: Residential admissions frequently blow through a typical HDHP deductible ($3,000–$10,000 family) quickly, so the post-deductible coverage matters most. Verify the residential benefit structure after deductible carefully — some HDHPs have generous post-deductible coverage, others are coinsurance-heavy.

What commercial insurance typically covers — by level of care

Level of care	Typical coverage	Patient cost
Outpatient counseling (ASAM 1.0)	Covered	Copay per visit or coinsurance
IOP (ASAM 2.1)	Covered with prior auth	Coinsurance on allowed amount
PHP (ASAM 2.5)	Covered with prior auth	Coinsurance; some plans apply inpatient rules
Residential (ASAM 3.1–3.7)	Covered with prior auth	Daily coinsurance or inpatient cost-share
Medical detox (ASAM 3.2-WM, 3.7-WM)	Covered with prior auth	Coinsurance or daily inpatient cost-share
Hospital detox (ASAM 4.0-WM)	Covered under inpatient medical benefits	Inpatient deductible + coinsurance
MAT office visits + medication	Covered under pharmacy + Part B-equivalent	Copay/coinsurance, sometimes pharmacy tier

“Covered with prior auth” means the clinical necessity of the level of care must be approved by the plan’s Utilization Management team, typically using ASAM Criteria as the medical-necessity framework post-SB 855. Initial authorizations are short (7–14 days for residential); continued-stay authorizations happen concurrently during the stay.

Prior authorization — the step that trips most families

Prior authorization (PA) is the process by which the insurance plan reviews clinical documentation and approves (or denies) coverage for a specific level of care. For residential SUD admissions, PA is the most common friction point in access.

How PA works for SUD residential:

1. Admitting facility’s clinical team conducts an ASAM assessment — typically by phone or video for urgent admissions
2. Facility submits clinical documentation to the carrier’s Utilization Management (UM) department
3. UM reviewer evaluates medical necessity — a nurse or physician reviewer applies the carrier’s medical-necessity criteria (post-SB 855, these should align with ASAM Criteria for California state-regulated plans)
4. Initial authorization period — usually 7 to 14 days, not full-stay
5. Concurrent review — facility submits updates every 3–7 days; carrier approves or denies continued-stay days
6. Discharge and potential retrospective review — occasionally plans retro-deny days after discharge, though this is less common

Common PA denial patterns:

• “Does not meet ASAM criteria for residential” — carrier argues a lower level of care (IOP, PHP) would suffice
• “Step-down not exhausted” — carrier argues less-restrictive care should be tried first
• “Co-occurring condition primary” — carrier argues the primary diagnosis is psychiatric, not substance-related (affecting which benefit category covers the stay)

Post-SB 855, denials rooted in proprietary medical-necessity criteria (rather than ASAM) are more easily overturnable on appeal. Ask the facility to document the ASAM-based clinical justification in appeal submissions.

Appealing a denial

Internal appeal (first step)

Every California state-regulated plan must provide an internal appeal process. File within the plan’s stated window (typically 60–180 days from denial). Include:

• The denial letter
• Additional clinical documentation supporting medical necessity — ASAM-based assessment is strongest
• Specific citation to the parity standard being violated, if applicable
• Provider statement of medical necessity from the admitting facility

Internal appeals take 30 days (standard) or 72 hours (urgent) for California state-regulated plans.

External appeal — California Independent Medical Review

If the internal appeal is denied, California’s Independent Medical Review (IMR) is the external appeal path for state-regulated plans. IMR is:

• Free to the patient
• Conducted by an independent panel not affiliated with the carrier
• Binding on the carrier if the reviewer sides with the patient
• Typically decided in 30 days (7 days for urgent cases)

IMR overturn rates have historically run around 65-70% for mental health and SUD denials nationally — meaning the appeal process meaningfully changes outcomes.

Parity complaint — California DMHC

Patterns of restrictive coverage that appear to violate MHPAEA or SB 855 can be reported to the California DMHC Complaint process. Parity investigations sometimes produce regulatory actions that benefit a broader class of plan members beyond the individual complainant.

Federal pathways

ERISA-governed self-funded employer plans are not subject to California state parity (SB 855). Federal MHPAEA still applies. Disputes on ERISA plans can be raised with the DOL Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA).

Specific cost-sharing examples — what patients actually pay

Commercial insurance cost-sharing for SUD treatment varies widely by plan, carrier, and network status. The ranges below reflect typical commercial coverage in California; your specific plan’s Summary of Benefits and Coverage (SBC) is the authoritative source for your cost-sharing. Ranges shown are typical; confirm with your plan documents.

Residential SUD treatment (ASAM 3.1–3.7) — typical patient cost

Plan with $2,000 deductible, 80/20 coinsurance (common PPO structure):

• First 5 days of residential: patient pays deductible ($2,000)
• Days 6 through MOOP: 20% coinsurance on plan’s allowed daily rate
• Once annual MOOP is reached (typically $8,500–$15,000 individual, $17,000–$30,000 family): patient pays $0 for the rest of the plan year

Plan with $1,500 deductible, 90/10 coinsurance (lower cost-share plan):

• Deductible hit in first few days
• 10% coinsurance through MOOP
• Total patient cost typically $4,000–$8,000 for a 30-day stay depending on facility billed rate and plan’s allowed amount

Plan with $3,000 deductible, 70/30 coinsurance (higher cost-share plan, often Silver-tier Covered California):

• Deductible + higher coinsurance means patient cost-share is more significant
• Total patient cost for 30-day stay commonly $6,000–$12,000

High-deductible health plan (HDHP) + HSA:

• Deductibles frequently $3,000–$8,000 individual, $6,000–$16,000 family
• HSA-funded coverage available for qualified medical expenses
• Post-deductible coverage may be 100% or may carry coinsurance

IOP (ASAM 2.1) — typical patient cost

• Per-session copay or coinsurance — commonly $25–$75 copay per session, or 20–30% coinsurance on plan’s allowed amount
• Full IOP program (8–12 weeks) — patient cost typically $800–$2,500 out-of-pocket
• Prior authorization required: carrier must approve the level of care

Standard outpatient — typical patient cost

• Per-visit copay — commonly $20–$50 for in-network mental health / SUD specialist visit
• Deductible may or may not apply depending on plan tier
• No prior auth for individual outpatient sessions typically

Out-of-network residential on a PPO plan

OON residential is the most financially variable scenario. Typical structure:

• Facility bills, e.g., $40,000 for a 30-day stay
• Plan’s usual-and-customary (U&C) rate: $18,000–$25,000 (varies by carrier and geography)
• Plan pays 50–70% of U&C (OON benefit): ~$10,000–$18,000 to facility
• Patient pays OON deductible + OON coinsurance on U&C: $4,000–$10,000
• Patient potentially liable for balance (difference between billed and U&C): up to $15,000–$20,000

The balance-billing exposure is the single biggest financial risk of OON residential admission. Patients frequently negotiate with facilities to accept the insurance-allowed amount as full payment; many luxury facilities operate on this “verify-and-bill” model structurally.

Under the No Surprises Act, balance-billing is restricted in emergency settings and at in-network facilities. It remains permitted for scheduled non-emergency OON admissions.

Covered California marketplace plans and SUD coverage

Covered California is the state’s health insurance marketplace, offering individual and family plans from most major California carriers. All Covered California plans cover SUD treatment under Essential Health Benefits and California SB 855 parity. Differences among plans are cost-sharing structure, not coverage scope.

Metal tier structure (actuarial value in parentheses — the average share of costs the plan covers):

• Bronze (60%) — lowest premium, highest deductible and OOP. SUD residential authorization may hit full deductible in first few days. Best for patients expecting low utilization.
• Silver (70%) — mid-tier premium and cost-sharing. Enhanced Silver plans (Silver 73, 87, 94) offer reduced cost-sharing for patients qualifying by income.
• Gold (80%) — higher premium, lower cost-sharing. Better for patients expecting higher utilization.
• Platinum (90%) — highest premium, lowest cost-sharing. Best for high-utilization scenarios.
• Minimum Coverage (Catastrophic) — available only to under-30 or hardship-exempt enrollees. Not ideal for SUD coverage.

Practical implication for SUD coverage: a patient anticipating residential treatment during a plan year is typically better financially on a Gold or Platinum plan than Bronze or Silver, because the residential stay will frequently meet deductible and MOOP quickly. Once MOOP is hit, all four metal tiers cover 100% of covered services.

Special Enrollment Period (SEP): loss of prior coverage, new diagnosis, or other qualifying life events can trigger an SEP allowing mid-year plan changes. SUD diagnosis alone typically doesn’t qualify; loss of employer-sponsored coverage does.

Income-based subsidies: Advanced Premium Tax Credits (APTC) and Cost-Sharing Reductions (CSR) reduce monthly premiums and cost-sharing for qualifying income ranges. Covered California enrollment counselors can walk through subsidy eligibility.

Carrier comparison — which plan for which situation

No single carrier is “best” for SUD coverage; fit depends on geography, plan type, specific SUD treatment needed, and continuing medical relationships. Decision framework:

Kaiser Permanente — when it fits

• You are already a Kaiser member with established primary care in the Kaiser system
• Your clinical situation can be well-served by Kaiser’s integrated CDRP (Chemical Dependency Recovery Program)
• You prefer an integrated delivery model with coordinated medical, psychiatric, and SUD care under one organization
• You value lower cost-sharing and simpler administrative experience
• Caution: out-of-Kaiser residential access requires exception approval, rarely granted routinely

Anthem Blue Cross of California PPO — when it fits

• You want broad out-of-network flexibility for residential admissions
• You may want to access specific facilities (Malibu concierge, luxury-tier) that operate OON
• You value provider choice over lower premium
• Caution: OON cost-sharing can be substantial; verify the OON benefit carefully

Anthem Blue Cross HMO or EPO — when it fits

• You need commercial coverage but prefer in-network managed care
• Anthem’s HMO provider network in your county is adequate for your needs
• Lower premium than PPO

Blue Shield of California PPO — when it fits

• Similar profile to Anthem PPO; nonprofit alternative
• Blue Shield’s provider network may include specific facilities Anthem doesn’t, or vice versa — check both directories
• Strong California-specific regulatory protection (DMHC oversight for HMO products)

Blue Shield Trio HMO — when it fits

• Narrower network than full-network Blue Shield; lower premium
• Adequate when the network includes your preferred providers
• Integrated model with Dignity Health / Hill Physicians / UCSF

Tricare — when it fits

• You are a military beneficiary (active duty, retiree, family, Reserve/Guard)
• Your situation benefits from Tricare’s specific provider network or MTF access
• See our Tricare pillar for full detail

Medi-Cal DMC-ODS — when it fits

• You are Medi-Cal eligible (income under 138% FPL for MAGI Medi-Cal, or other eligibility categories)
• Zero out-of-pocket cost matters materially to your situation
• You can access treatment through county DMC-ODS pathways
• See our Medi-Cal pillar for full detail

Self-funded ERISA employer plans — variable

• Governed by federal MHPAEA (parity applies) but not California SB 855
• DMHC IMR not available; appeals go through federal DOL EBSA
• Specific coverage terms defined by employer plan document
• Often underwritten or administered by commercial carriers (Anthem, Aetna, UnitedHealth) but the plan benefits are the employer’s, not the carrier’s standard

Common denial patterns and how to counter each

California commercial carriers use several recurring denial patterns for residential SUD. Each has a standard counter.

Denial: “Does not meet ASAM criteria for residential”

What it means: carrier’s UM reviewer determined that IOP or PHP would be clinically sufficient instead of residential.

Counter: submit comprehensive ASAM-based clinical documentation covering all six dimensions:

• Acute intoxication/withdrawal potential (document CIWA-Ar score for alcohol, COWS for opioid, or equivalent)
• Biomedical conditions (medical comorbidities, recent hospitalizations)
• Emotional/behavioral/cognitive conditions (current psychiatric status, suicidality, impulsivity)
• Readiness to change
• Relapse/continued-use potential (prior outpatient failures, recent relapse patterns)
• Recovery/living environment (document any specific factors making home environment contraindicated)

Denials under this pattern frequently overturn on appeal when ASAM documentation is thorough.

Denial: “Step-down not exhausted”

What it means: carrier argues the patient should have tried less-restrictive care first.

Counter: document prior outpatient or IOP attempts, failures, or clinical contraindications to less-restrictive care. If the patient has never had outpatient SUD treatment, document why outpatient-first would be clinically inappropriate (severe withdrawal risk, active psychiatric crisis, unsafe home environment).

Denial: “Co-occurring condition primary”

What it means: carrier argues the patient’s primary diagnosis is psychiatric, not substance-related, which affects benefit-category coverage.

Counter: document DSM-5 SUD diagnosis clearly; request reassignment to SUD benefit category; or argue for dual-diagnosis residential under both benefit categories (many plans cover integrated treatment).

Denial: “Facility out-of-network”

What it means: for HMO/EPO plans, out-of-network residential is not covered except emergencies.

Counter: request in-network exception if (a) adequate in-network capacity doesn’t exist for the required specialty (e.g., LGBTQ+-specific, adolescent, or pregnant-specific programs), (b) the patient has established clinical relationship with the OON provider, or (c) geographic access issues mean no in-network provider is reasonably accessible. Exceptions are sometimes granted; denial of a well-documented exception request is appealable to DMHC.

Denial: “Continued stay not medically necessary” (concurrent review denial)

What it means: carrier argues the patient no longer meets residential criteria and should step down.

Counter: document specific clinical factors warranting continued residential — active withdrawal symptoms, medication stabilization still in progress, recent relapse episode within residential, psychiatric decompensation. Step-down to PHP (not directly to outpatient) is often accepted by carriers as a middle-ground solution when they push back on continued residential.

The detailed appeals process

Internal appeal — step by step

1. Read the denial letter carefully — identify the specific medical-necessity criterion cited, the appeals address, and the filing deadline (typically 60–180 days from denial)
2. Gather documentation — ASAM assessment, treating clinician’s letter of medical necessity, relevant prior records, peer-reviewed clinical guidelines supporting your position (ASAM Criteria, SAMHSA TIPs, specific research)
3. Draft the appeal letter — state the specific denial being appealed, cite the clinical evidence, reference parity law if applicable, request specific relief (authorization of days, level of care, etc.)
4. Submit within deadline — certified mail or traceable electronic submission
5. Follow up — California plans must decide urgent appeals in 72 hours and non-urgent in 30 days

Sample language for an ASAM-based internal appeal:

“This appeal concerns Anthem’s denial dated [date] of residential SUD treatment at [facility] for [patient]. The denial cites [specific criterion]. Attached is a comprehensive ASAM Criteria assessment documenting [patient]‘s clinical presentation across all six ASAM dimensions, demonstrating medical necessity for ASAM Level [X] residential treatment. Under California SB 855 (codified at [Health and Safety Code section]), medical necessity for SUD treatment must be determined using generally accepted standards of care, including the ASAM Criteria. We respectfully request reversal of the denial and authorization of the full course of medically necessary treatment.”

DMHC Independent Medical Review — step by step

If internal appeal is denied (or the carrier fails to respond within required timeframes):

1. Apply for IMR at dmhc.ca.gov/FileaComplaint within 6 months of the final internal denial
2. No cost to the patient
3. Independent panel of medical experts (typically physicians specializing in the relevant condition) reviews the case
4. Binding decision: if IMR sides with the patient, the carrier must cover the disputed treatment
5. Timeline: approximately 30 days for non-urgent, 3–7 days for urgent

IMR has historically demonstrated meaningful overturn rates for mental health and SUD denials based on DMHC published reporting. This is a substantively helpful appeal pathway.

DMHC parity complaint — step by step

For patterns of restrictive coverage that appear to violate MHPAEA or SB 855:

1. File complaint at dmhc.ca.gov/FileaComplaint
2. Describe the pattern: not just your individual denial, but the broader plan practice you believe violates parity
3. DMHC investigates — timeline varies; formal investigations take months
4. Regulatory enforcement: DMHC can require plan changes, fines, or corrective action benefiting the entire member class

Parity complaints are the appropriate pathway when you believe a plan is systematically imposing more restrictive SUD criteria than medical-surgical criteria — not just a single wrong denial.

Federal appeals for ERISA plans

Self-funded employer plans governed by ERISA follow federal appeal procedures:

1. Internal appeal with plan administrator — typical 60-day filing window
2. External review via Independent Review Organization (IRO) — specific process varies by plan
3. DOL Employee Benefits Security Administration complaint — for parity violations
4. ERISA civil action — federal court, typically after exhausting plan remedies

Federal appeals timelines can be longer than California IMR; the substance of the appeal (ASAM-based medical necessity, parity violation documentation) is similar.

The No Surprises Act and SUD treatment

The federal No Surprises Act (2022) protects patients from balance-billing in specific scenarios relevant to SUD care:

• Emergency services, including emergency detox at an in-network or out-of-network facility — patient liable only for in-network cost-sharing
• Out-of-network care at in-network facilities without patient consent — applies when a patient admits to an in-network residential but receives services from OON clinicians within that facility (e.g., OON physician rounds)
• Good-faith estimates required for self-pay and uninsured patients before non-emergency service — a facility quoting a residential stay must provide a good-faith cost estimate

The No Surprises Act does not require insurance to cover out-of-network residential at in-network rates outside these specific scenarios. An OON residential admission under a PPO still runs OON cost-sharing.

How to verify benefits without triggering facility sales

The standard path to “verify insurance” for residential SUD treatment is calling a facility’s admissions line. The facility runs a verification of benefits (VOB) against your plan and quotes what your stay will cost. This works — but it also opens a sales relationship. Admissions staff at commercial facilities are incentivized to close admissions, and “verifying insurance” frequently becomes an intake call where the facility pushes for admission before the patient has finished evaluating options.

Our Verify Insurance tool is the editorial-independence alternative: a benefits verification service operating as a standalone tool, not as a referral funnel. You provide plan details, the tool returns coverage specifics for the services you’re considering, and you retain full agency over what facility to approach.

Alternatives to both:

• Call your plan directly using the member services number on the back of your card. Ask for: residential SUD benefit specifics, prior-authorization requirements, in-network residential providers in your area, out-of-network benefit (if PPO), and deductible status.
• Request a good-faith estimate from the facility under the No Surprises Act. This is required for self-pay and requested-for-insurance scenarios.

Carrier-specific coverage

Commercial SUD coverage varies by carrier. Our dedicated pillars cover the specifics:

• Kaiser Permanente Rehab Coverage — integrated-system SUD care, CDRP, member access mechanics
• Anthem Blue Cross of California Rehab Coverage — network types, prior auth, PPO vs HMO dynamics
• Blue Shield of California Rehab Coverage — commercial and Promise (Medi-Cal), parity compliance
• Tricare Rehab Coverage in California — military beneficiaries, TriWest, VA coordination
• Medi-Cal DMC-ODS Coverage — public-payer SUD coverage across the six SoCal counties

Aetna, Cigna, United Healthcare, Humana, and other commercial carriers operate in California under similar frameworks. Specific plan documents (Summary of Benefits and Coverage, Evidence of Coverage) are the authoritative source for carrier-specific coverage terms.

Related coverage

• Cost of Rehab in Southern California — Pricing by ASAM level
• Medi-Cal Coverage for Addiction Treatment — Public-payer pathway
• How to Choose a Rehab in SoCal — Clinical fit after verification
• How to Verify a California Rehab Is Legitimate — Facility verification
• SoCal Facility Directory — By Insurance — Filter by carrier

Need help navigating your insurance for addiction treatment?

Our editorial team can walk you through parity protections, plan-specific coverage questions, and the appeal process if you’re facing a denial. We do not take referral fees from facilities. We are not a call center. Calls are informational.

Contact our editorial team →

Use the Verify Insurance tool →

Need help now? Call (310) 596-1751.

---

Last reviewed: 2026-04-23. Parity law references reflect federal MHPAEA and California SB 855 as enacted. DMHC and DOL enforcement processes reflect published procedures at review date. This page is editorial content, not legal or benefits-navigation advice. For specific plan coverage questions, consult your plan’s Evidence of Coverage or a licensed California insurance navigator.